The Obama Cover-Up on Benghazi

Blog Post

I know that I am joining EBL and Gateway Pundit in commenting on this potential reason for the Obama Administration’s cover up of the source of the Jihadist attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi. 
I realize that most Americans are asleep or are indifferent when it comes to situations such as this one, but Barack Obama is the Commander-in-Chief and Secretary Clinton is SECSTATE. They are or should be accountable for what they do.

The Obama State Department withdrew a 16 member special forces team from Benghazi one month before the deadly attacks on 9-11. Lt. Col. Andy Wood was the leader of the 16 member special forces team whose job it was to protect US personnel in Libya. His team’s mission ended in August a month before the deadly Al-Qaeda attack on 9-11. A six member mobile security team was also withdrawn around the same time. This was despite the fact that there were over a dozen attacks in the country this year. Lt. Col. Wood was subpoenaed to appear at a House committee hearing this coming week. Wood told CBS News it was unbelievable to him that the State Department withdrew security when they did because of the 13 security incidents before 9-11. (Gateway Pundit)

CNN was aware of this and agreed to the White House request to spike the story? Why would a news organization do that? Why unless they were stakeholders in President Obama’s re-election? 
Will Hillary Clinton be the next one to take a spear in the chest for Barack Obama’s failed policies? There was word that John Kerry wanted the SECSTATE job in the next Obama Administration and after he turned out to be a less than sterling debate coach, Obama stopped promising.
Hillary pulled the security team that led to the deaths of two Navy SEALs, the US Ambassador and a state department employee at the hands of terrorists. Ambassador Stevens was tortured before he was murdered. 
I wonder if Governor Romney will bring this up in his foreign policy speech tomorrow?

–Why else would they have blamed a video on Mohammed that nobody saw?
–Why else would they have declared this a spontaneous act rather than a terrorist attack?
–Why did the Obama Administration ignore the warnings of Lt. Col Andy Wood, the Special Forces commander on the scene in Libya?
–Do you think that Obama will drop out of the race for the presidency and let Joe Biden carry the ball for him over the finish line? (no, neither do I)

8 thoughts on “The Obama Cover-Up on Benghazi

  1. LL: In any rational world, Benghazi should be Obama's Waterloo. But it may be that the U.S. voters has been so successfully idiotized by Obama's teacher union allies since the last SCoaMF held the presidency from 1976-1979 that there is no hope to dislodge him, at least for his massive foreign policy failures.

    Assuming he does go down November 6th, I'm pretty sure it will be on account of the miserable economy not his staggering clusterf_ck of a foreign policy.

  2. I think that you're right. The US voters are almost always swayed by domestic policy at the voting booth. George HW Bush was defeated despite very successful foreign policy because he neglected the situation at home IMHO.

  3. Obama leads from the golf course and is known for grandiose apology tours and liberals including the Teacher's Unions and CAIR seem to love that. However, we need to keep hoping that enough Americans wake up to reverse the curse.

  4. obama et al, are not fond of SpecOps people. This of course can result in the death of lots of operators.

  5. Obama is not fond of the military because most soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines are not communists and collectivists at heart. They don't trust Obama's secret "flexibility" with the Russians after this coming election.

    He'd sell out any of us for any small reason.

  6. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only two times, since 1960, has the unemployment dropped by 0.5 percentage points in a two month span.
    The first time this happened was in 1984 under President Ronald Reagan
    The only other time (in over 50 years, again) is occurring right now under President Obama (Aug & Sept, 2012). When the rate went from 8.3 to 7.8,
    Think about that again. In over 50 years, starting with President John F. Kennedy, only twice has the unemployment rate dropped by 0.5 percentage points within a 2-month span. But then again we are dealing with Barack Obama the Messiah, so anything can happen…
    So we are to believe that one of those times is happening right now – under a president with the worst jobs record in history, one month before the most important election of our time – all with a backdrop of anemic GDP and job creation. Oh, and when Obama conveniently needed to get to 7.8% to "break even." And exactly one month before the election and 2 days after he got his Ass Whipped by his opponent.
    This is really getting ridiculous. We have a dope in the while house who takes us for total morons, just because he is used to be dealing with the morons, idiots in his administration.
    Wake up you progressive fools, the numbers just do not add up.
    There is no rational for a .3% drop when the new jobs are nearly the same as last month! But suddenly out of the blue, the single largest monthly gain in almost 50 years takes place? Can you imagine the media outrage if GWB used those numbers? This country is in real trouble when the government openly lies to its citizens. I for one just can not believe my own government any more. And that’s pretty dam sad.

  7. I don't thinking that you're taking in to account that the mainstream media is desperate. Chris Matthews will have lost that lovin' feeling if Obama is defeated. No more tingle – maybe ever. And what about all of the political parasites that followed Obama into office and the welfare queens who rely on him for their daily bread – that the rest of us earn?

    No, if he walks on water, surrounded by rainbows and unicorns, the statistics are whatever He says they are. (figures lie and liars figure)

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top