Some History

Blog Post

 

Bullet Points:

** The end of election fraud or elections? (American Thinker)

Voter registration time-series data shows the active intercession of governmental election commissions altering data, illegally changing voter rolls, and giving non-government, leftist actors illegal access to voter rolls during elections — thus rigging elections.

Current technology employed by Trump and the RNC cannot see any of it — as we proved in the Kari Lake election.

Our team found active voter commission interference in the data in Arizona and Wisconsin elections.  Both swing states.

** When you allow Marxists to state that “Spanish” is a race (instead of a language), except when they need to prove ” whiteness is a problem”.  (more from American Thinker)

 

 

Maps

 

The Italians are everywhere (Claudio)… Percentage of the population of Italian descent in Brazil and Argentina.

 

Ravaillac

A historical view of one particular regicide

Before the guillotine made French people equal, and before the abolition of capital punishment altogether made them equal and also not dead, tradition dictated that commoners be hanged and nobles beheaded. Two crimes however warranted a special kind of execution, being heresy with the condemned burnt at the stake and in this case regicide, which specifically demanded quartering for some reason.  

François Ravaillac was the product of the French Wars of Religion, a series of conflicts during the Protestant Reformation that tore France apart, only ending when the leader of the Calvinist Huguenots Henri III de Bourbon, king of Navarre and issued from a cadet branch of the royal dynasty of France, succeeded to Henri III de Valois, king of France.

The condition of his coronation was for him to convert to Catholicism, which he did, being quoted as saying “Paris is well worth a mass”. Ravaillac was born in a staunchly catholic family, being raised by his two uncles, both canons in the local cathedral, to bear a fervent hatred of Huguenots. His unstable mind led him to quit a well-off situation working as a clerk to try and join a monastic order, of which he was kicked out after only a few weeks. Now penniless and aimless, he started experiencing visions and confessed multiple times over the years of having committed “homicide through intent”, growing more and more resentful of the king whom he saw as the Antichrist ready to wage war on his people and move the Holy See from Rome to Paris.  

After stealing a knife from an inn, he eventually graduated to “homicide through actual homicide” after stalking the royal carriage all the way to one of the traffic jams Paris is famous for, giving him the opportunity to stab the king twice in the chest when it stopped.

Image
Image

  Execution warrant for François Ravaillac from the Parisian parliament headed with the name of King Louis XIII and bearing the later archival stamps of both the French Empire and the French Republic. It describes the murder as a parricide, the murder of a relative, as the king was seen as a literal father figure to all his subjects.

After being held in protective custody in a private hotel, then transferred to the Conciergerie prison and tortured/tried for ten days, Ravaillac was sentenced to death on the 27th of May 1610. His regicide was ruled to be the act of a lone religious fanatic without any accomplice. The same day, he was taken to the place de Grêve in front of Paris’ town hall, where public executions had traditionally been held for at least 300 years. All according to his execution warrant, Ravaillac’s chest, arms, thighs, and calves were pulled apart with tongs; his right hand which had held the knife was cut off and thrown onto burning sulfur; his wounds were covered in molten lead, boiling oil, pitch, wax, and sulfur; finally, his limbs were attached to four horses, pulling them from their sockets – allegedly with some help from an axe – completing the quartering proper.

Image

Unfortunately for him and in a striking karmic twist, some insult was added to Ravaillac’s supplice, as his legacy was to cement Henri IV’s own as the Good King Henry. The king’s martyr at the hand of a madman garnered sympathy and dispelled his previous image of a Bourbon usurper with Catholics and of relapse with Protestants, working wonders to unify the two under the new monarchy. Henri’s progeny would not only rule France for another 182 years without interruption, but Spain, Luxembourg, and other holdings in Italy.

 

From the Days of Fighting Sail

The Midshipman

The path could be very long and thorny at times and many hurdles had to be overcome. One of these hurdles was finding a supporter. This supporter had to help a young man to get an apprenticeship on a ship. In the beginning, it didn’t matter what kind of skills he had, how he applied, or if he had passed an aptitude test. They only needed someone who was authorized to fill such an apprenticeship and they could take whoever they wanted. This led to the so-called protection system. This meant that you could get advantages in every possible way as long as you returned the favor. And so it could be that a rich man who found that his son should go to sea gave the captain a large sum of money, and then took the boy in.

This, unfortunately, led to the fact that many supposed talents found their way onto a ship, while true talents first tried their hand on a trading ship. But there was also the so-called Kings letter. This was a specific letter issued by the admiralty that forced the captain to take the boy in. But this happened very rarely.

Image

A Portrait of a Midshipman, by Sir Martin Archer Shee (1769-1850)

If a young gentleman found an apprenticeship, he was between 11 (later it was raised to 12) and 16 years old. There he started as Captain’s Servant – from 1794 it became the Volunteer first class. But not without his parents or a guardian paying for him. Servants were a source of income for the Captain. For example, the young man had to pay an annual fee, an extra allowance, and pocket money, and his parents had to pay for his uniform, etc. In addition, there was a supply subsidy which had to be paid for 30 to 40 pounds for boys under 15 years and 70 to 100 for boys from 15 years on. 2- 3 years after learning the basics a servant was allowed to call himself a midshipman after confirmation of the captain.

Image

Midshipman Blockhead, Fitting out Mastr Willm Blockhead HM Ship Hellfire West India Station, by Captain Frederick Marryat, 1820

After 1678 it was necessary for a midshipman to take an exam to become a lieutenant. This meant that a good education was necessary. A lieutenancy in this context required a minimum service of six years on an HM ship (at least two of those years as a midshipman).

The Academy

Influenced by the three great naval academies in France, the Naval College at Portsmouth was finally opened in 1733. It was intended to provide young men with a sound basic education and thus make Servant service superfluous. Unfortunately, this met with only moderate success. The academy also taught: writing, arithmetic, drawing, navigation, gunnery, fortification, other useful parts of mathematics, French, dancing, fencing, and the exercise of firelocks. However, many of them relied on the old system and the academy only took in 40 students per year, although there was capacity for more. It closed its doors again in 1837. In the second half of the 18th century, the second college opened in Gosport, and since 1873 it was referred to as the Royal Naval College in Greenwich.

Image

The Royal Navy College in Greenwich

On board, the older officers and the captain took over the teaching. If the ship was large enough, there was also a schoolmaster from 1702. If there was not a chaplain, he took over the general education while the nautical instruction remained with the officers.

The exams

As already mentioned, a midshipman had to pass an exam to continue as a lieutenant. This meant that he had to have been at sea for at least 6 years. Unfortunately, there were cases where a boy was entered into the ship’s logbooks at baby age to give him a better career and early payment. Of course, it was forbidden but many of them were related and knew what was going on. Nothing was done about it. The exam itself was taken in London, later also in other large home ports and overseas on the orders of an admiral present there, but if he was not there the gentlemen had to wait until the admiral was present again. Because only he was allowed to choose three captains who took the examination. At this time the applicant had to be at least 20, from 1806 on 19 was enough. In 1790 a catalog of 30 questions was compiled, but here too, nepotism was a factor, because if the uncle, cousin, or old family friend was sitting there, then it was often a very simple, almost ridiculous question.

Image

Midshipmen studying for their Lieutenant’s examination aboard HMS Pallas. Sketch by Lt. Gabriel Bray, 1774

It is astonishing that useful officers came out of the system. But since every failure is down to the officer (usually a lieutenant who had at least one midshipman under his protection) and the captain, they wanted their protégés to learn something useful. Therefore they were given tasks early on, such as hoisting signals and commanding a boat and the older ones even got the command of a small prize. This usually meant a lot of practice and knowledge.

Besides the boys, deserving sailors could earn themselves the post of a Midshipman, so that it was possible to have children at the age of 11, and adult men in their 40s. This was also possible if the midshipman did not pass the exam or there was no job for him. Because not everyone who passed the exam was promoted to lieutenant. Then he had not passed the gentleman’s examination and was therefore only a passed midshipman waiting for a job. From 1804 this was called sublieutenant.

Life on board

The boys were accommodated in the very narrow midshipmen berth. The oldest midshipman was in command of his comrades in the Berth, which often led to mobbing and group formation. The very young were mothered a little by the Gunner and his wife – the only one legally on board.

Image

‘Master B finding things not exactly what he expected, the midshipman arrives on board ship; study for an illustration to ‘The Life of a Midshipman’ by Captain Frederick Marryat, 1820

The boys were punished by other officers but never by the crew. Most of the time they were mastheaded, tied in the shrouds, or put over the cannon to be spanked with a cane. The food was the same as the crew, but sometimes the captain, when eating with his lieutenants, would give the excess food to the boys. All in all this time was not very easy, but at the same time, it was a great adventure. Many had only good things to report when they came across a good captain with capable officers.

27 thoughts on “Some History

  1. Another great history lesson; both the Royal Navy and of France, many thanks.

    Election fraud. I am pretty certain that the RNC does not want to officially see the fraud. The majority of the party has grown comfortable in the second place position. There is certainly a whole lot of “it wasn’t us give us more money” coming to me in the mail. I no longer donate to the RNC but do donate to individual candidates.

    Interesting about the number of people of Italian descent that live in Argentina and southern Brazil.

    Regicide, seems like a bit of overkill but who am I to judge.

    1. It’s like being court marshalled, shot, and sent to the Russian Front…

    2. Agree that the RNC is doing a full Sgt. Schultz imitation. You’d think Trump would have gained interest in it after the last election.

    3. Contrary to what the Quakers and leftists believe, making the punishment for crimes be as heinous or more heinous than the actual crime does work well in suppressing criminals, mostly working on the maybe-criminals but not working on the hardened criminals, except to end the abilities and lives of said hardened criminals.

      Bring back public floggings and public hangings. Make corporal and capital punishment great again.

      1. The problem I have with the death penalty is that this is the same government who can’t get my drivers license right when I moved.

        Lots of cases on very little evidence around the world. A review of last execution in Australia (after the event) found that the prison guard was shot by one of his colleagues not the escapee. Unfortunately for the prisoner he was already dead.

        For proven child killers, terrorists etc slow rope is fine.

        1. There are some sketchy death penalty cases.

          But there are far more that the burden of proof is a supertanker full of real honest proof, often with video and DNA evidence. Those are the ones to target for elimination.

          1. The newest despicable DNA denier defense: “My client had a consensual sexual relationship with the deceased which is why his DNA was found in her right before her untimely death.”

            Only a degenerate defense attorney could come up with that one to cover for a rapist and a murderer…yet some jurors will buy it.

            “Attorney’s define the world in their terms then argue forever the meaning of those terms.”

      2. I probably would have stopped at drawing and quartering but, again, who am I to judge. I would support public punishment such as floggings etc. but we would have to stop making criminals an object of admiration for it to be truly effective.

        1. Sure. The justice system is flawed, and any justice system always will be.

          However, there is no point in even having one, if you aren’t going to do sensible punishments. What we have now has little positive effect, and just makes a zillion people rich while pushing career criminals in and out of revolving-door JailFare.

          What’s the alternative to the death penalty, life in prison? How is that not more cruel for the innocent man?

          -Kle.

  2. My wife was born in Argentina , she always said “There were more Italians in BA than Rome” That may be so.

        1. An epic meal with friends who can really cook affords those priceless life moments.

          Brother cooks like no other, always amazing when we “boys” and our spouses manage to get together for a meal, we follow his lead knowing it’ll be grand…and the menu unpronounceable.

  3. A lot of the Italians in Brazil/Argentina came in the latter stages of WWII, escaping the Germans or Fascist Italians under Mussolini. Midshipmen were an ‘interesting’ experiment by the Brits, some were successful, many were not, but it did bring the term into play.

    1. They tried to standardize the apprenticeship program. In the Army, commissions were purchased. In the Navy, skills were required to run a complex ship.

  4. The Gunner and his Wife….

    The Gunner was allowed to bring his wife aboard? Or am I missing something?

    1. Yes. Chief Gunner was a highly specialized position, and allowing said Gunner to have his wife helped retain skilled gunners. As to the wife, there were lots of young boys aboard working as powder monkeys. Someone had to keep them under control.

      The Captain of the ship could have his wife aboard, but in an unofficial basis.

      1. Depending on the size of the combatant (some had bullocks, goats, chickens, etc. onboard) it was not uncommon that in addition to the gunner’s wife (allowed by regs) that other women were allowed to serve, and were enrolled and paid at the apprentice rate as cook’s mates (cooks were often disabled sailors), etc.

  5. Seems like a pretty piss-poor example of Royal Security, letting some yobbo walk up with a knife, get in the carriage, and stab the King to death.

    On the bright side, WOOT DEAD KING! Pretty much always a win overall, even if not in the immediate term.

    -Kle.

    1. Then again, Archduke Franz Ferdinand Carl Ludwig Joseph Maria the heir presumptive to the throne of Austria-Hungary, and his wife were being driven in a motor car through Sarajevo, the provincial capital of Bosnia-Herzegovina where tensions had run hot against Austria in the past. A dimwit Bosnian Serb student Gavrilo Princip just walked up and gunned them both down (setting in motion World War 1). It would seem that the protection lesson hadn’t been learned.

      The war led to 20 million deaths and 21 million wounded. The total number of deaths includes 9.7 million military personnel and about 10 million civilians. The Entente Powers (also known as the Allies) lost about 5.7 million soldiers while the Central Powers lost about 4 million.

        1. You can today if you’re a democrat who contributes a lot of money. Bring a suitcase full of currency with you. They’ll love you long time.

  6. crims aren’t afraid of prison, but they fear the pain that the cane or noose will inflict. that said, death penalty should only be for those caught red handed. i have watched too many death row inmates exonerated twenty years later. and at least one in my state that was executed after new evidence was refused by a judge. i believe punishment should be shorter, but painful. recidivists should bear scars or missing appendages…..sailing was a hard life then and now. i am glad i didn’t sign that contract my senior year to be on a boomer. then again, i might be a little better off than now. more props to those that did.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top