Islamic Refugee Crisis

Blog Post
Various and sundry Muslim nations are killing their own people in addition to beheading Christians and queers and Christian queers. As a result, their people are setting sail with an eye toward settling in Great Britain, in Big Europe or in the US.  I find it strange that they want to flee to Christian nations.
Fox News reported that the United Nations is calling for rich nations to take Muslim refugees – 1 million to start. The US is naturally the biggest chump, so it’s the first place to start. The UK is the second biggest chump, so I’m certain that they’ll take a million and put them on the dole.

The Australians have said, “Not now, not ever, never.Those among you who are progressive will likely foam at the mouth at the Australian refusal to import terrorists into their country. I agree, it’s not very inclusive of them.

(Fox News) The humanitarian disaster unfolding on the Mediterranean is likely already providing a “shield” for Islamist terrorists to infiltrate waves of migrants attempting the perilous crossing from North Africa to Europe, terrorism experts and other strategic observers are warning. And they say a UN plan to resettle 1 million refugees in Western nations would turn the situation into a full-blown security crisis. 
The exodus now unfolding, as well as the UN call to take in refugees from war-torn Middle Eastern and African nations over the next five years, is providing a “shield for the passage of jihadists to Europe,” said one analyst. Once absorbed into the societies of Europe and other rich countries such as the United States, ISIS operatives would be set to eventually gain all the freedoms of other citizens of those countries – including the freedom to travel, often without having to go through the extra scrutiny involved in obtaining a passport visa.
There are no richer nations than Saudi Arabia and Iran. They are awash in oil revenue. I suggest that the Muslim refugees go to these Islamic havens. Wherever they go, they should NOT be allowed into the US. Let the Sunni go to Saudi Arabia and the Shites go to Iran.

If the Iranians can afford to build bombs, they can certainly afford to feed a few million more of their brethren in the spirit of Muslim love and the Five Pillars of Islam.

9 thoughts on “Islamic Refugee Crisis

  1. I get this weird feeling that Saudi and Iran won't take any refugees. Of course we could send them all to Baltimore.

  2. Sure, they'd arrive, be taken to centers where they sign them up for all of their benefits, etc. All nice and legal.

  3. We would need to wall off Baltimore from the rest of the nation first…it can be done. Or they could be sent to Detroit. (walled off as well) They couldn't do much to break Detroit but there's not much difference between Detroit and Baltimore that a few years won't fix.

  4. The Saudis are already importing slave laborers from Pakistan and other Muslim counties. Let them make indentured servants over the whole lot of them, just like the early English settlers here in the 17th and 18th century.

  5. I don't think that they're allowed to "enslave" fellow Muslims, but they clearly can indenture them. GREAT IDEA. You should be Secretary General of the UN!! In fact, you have my vote — oh, I forgot, we can't vote for that…

  6. There are answers to these questions. You just haven't asked the right liberal.

  7. I think that Nancy Pelosi should take in a few families. They can live in her mansion with her. She must have half a dozen unused bedrooms.

  8. Your logic (and that of the Australians) is impeccable.
    Millions of members of a religion that fundamentally wishes to be ruled by a caliphate (as I understand it) don't seem like they're going to be especially content living in the US. I'd rather not deal with hoards of malcontent Muslims…

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top