Gun Free Zones – The New Standard of Safety!

Blog Post
It’s time to review how those gun-free zone declarations have worked out.


The British crown did their best to enforce a gun free zone and sent redcoats from house to house to disarm their own subjects but because it didn’t work, we are here. I do realize that many progressive Americans feel that it would be better if we were still ruled from London by a British Parliament that could levy taxes without representation the parliament — but it’s history.

James Madison wrote it this way: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed, and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms, shall be compelled to render military service in person.” It’s clear from reading Madison that the intent was that the American people had a right to arm themselves. This in the face of the “gun free zones” that the British had thought to enforce.

After that paragon of progressivism, The Journal News, published the addresses of every legal firearm owner within their circulation area (they didn’t have the information on the hoard of armed criminals), even the ultra uber leftist New York State Legislature passed a law in record time forbidding news organizations from doing it in the future. Apparently the district attorneys, judges, members of the legislature and police officers were uncomfortable with it. It would seem that the unarmed executives at the Journal News are also uncomfortable with proclaiming their homes to be gun free zones. (see below) The question is WHY? I’m sure that they have no fear of judges and police officers who are the  sort of people impacted by limiting lawful firearms ownership.


The Duffle Blog weighs in on a ‘gun free zone’ declared in Afghanistan.

(h/t The Duffle Blog) KABUL, AFGHANISTAN – Following the latest green-on-blue attacks, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has formally announced today that the entire nation of Afghanistan had been declared a gun-free zone.
“After over thirty years of senseless violence, I think it’s time we say no to big guns and the firearms industry that promotes them,” a tearful and visibly-tired Karzai told a crowd of Afghan legislators at the presidential palace in Kabul. 
Under the new government-approved policy, no one will be allowed to carry any type of firearm or ranged weapon in Afghanistan. Swords and knives are still permissible, as long as the owner possesses a Class-III license available at most government offices. 
There were concerns that many residents in this nation of firearms enthusiasts, widely described as “the freest people in the world”, would ignore the edict. This is a country where guns outnumber people 14:1 and actually have more civil rights than them. Many people proudly sport jalabiyas bearing the slogan “Live free or die”. Last year a DShK heavy machine gun was elected to parliament. And the national motto can be roughly translated as ‘A man should purchase a gun instead of a wife, because at least if someone looks at his gun he won’t have to take it out back and crush it with a heavy rock’. 
Several gun collection centers have been set up around the country under the leadership of female Afghan General Khatol Mohammad Zai, prompting a group of elderly mujahideen to release a statment saying: “I am a mujahideen veteran of 30 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me that I may not have one.” 
However following the announcement, many citizens rushed to turn in the millions of pistols, shotguns, rifles, belt-fed machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades, and anti-aircraft weaponry possessed by their families for generations. 
“We’re losing such a valuable part of our national identity,” sobbed farmer Haji Hayatullah as he drove his 438 firearms to the police station in the family tank. “My AK-47 has over thirty notches for every man it’s killed, and seventy half-notches for each woman and child.” 
Initially there was some hope that the edict would not affect the 130,000 ISAF/NATO soldiers serving throughout the country because the edict only affects men and women. Under the Afghan constitution, ISAF soldiers are not considered human
However ISAF spokesman Major Kimberly Ash said the International Security Assistance Force would also comply with the law and that all future patrols would be limited to bayonets and sharp pointed sticks. 
Surprisingly, Karzai’s decision has also been praised by his opponents in the Taliban. “Under Islamic traditions, firearms are considered bid’ah, or innovations,” said Taliban spiritual leader Mullah Omar. “The Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, never used a Soviet SKS semi-automatic rifle, a pressure plate IED, or a 107-millimeter rocket.” 
Mullah Omar added, “We are pleased that the infidel puppet Karzai has recognized this and we look forward to riding up to his palace on horseback and beheading him with a proper Islamic sword.”

4 thoughts on “Gun Free Zones – The New Standard of Safety!

  1. I can't help but wonder what will be the "new" Lexington, and what will be the "new" Concord… And it's ALL about appeasement in the Stan…

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top