Virtual Mirage reports Russian views to blog visitors because mainstream international media in English do not report them. They provide a different and useful perspective. To paraphrase the special advisor to the UN special representative for Syria, the Russians and the Americans have two entirely different interpretations about what is happening in Syria. They are “poles apart.”
In any confrontation, the other side has a say in the outcome. In this confrontation, the other side — Russia and Syria — has clearly stated goals and is on the verge of achieving them. 
First, let’s talk about Turkey
Turkey-Syria: Anadolu news agency reported on 8 December that Turkey is sending 300 more special forces soldiers to northern Syria to reinforce Operation Euphrates Shield. The special forces soldiers of 11th Command Brigade from Cardak Military Airport in western Turkey were airlifted to the Syrian border.

Remember that the Turks are fighting against the Kurds (American allies), not ISIS or the other Syrian militias.

President Erdogan is doubling down on his Syrian policy. The Turkish forces and their Free Syrian Army (FSA) proxies claim to have secured a safe area of 1,800 square kilometers (694 square miles). That is just over half the area of Rhode Island.
Based on open source reporting, the number of Turkish soldiers in Syria will exceed 1,000 men and about 25 tanks.
Meanwhile, Syrian Kurdish fighters remain in Manbij, are on the outskirts of al Bab and are cooperating with the Syrian army in northern Aleppo to seal it as an avenue of escape for the hard-core militants in eastern Aleppo.
Back to the Russians in Syria
On 8 December, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov met US Secretary of State Kerry briefly on the sidelines of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) foreign ministers’ conference in Hamburg, Germany. US and Russian representatives plan to meet in Geneva on Saturday, 10 December, to discuss the situation in Aleppo.
A European diplomat said, “We are witnessing talks on Aleppo which are just trying to tailor and to manage the Syrian and Russian victory.”
During a press conference in Hamburg, Lavrov again blasted the US-led Coalition and the UN special representative. In response to a question about Russia’s strategy for Aleppo, Lavrov said, “”Our strategy is very simple. It is totally based on the UN Security Council resolution that decreed that terrorists along the Syria axis are to be hit mercilessly and ruthlessly until their complete annihilation”
“In parallel, the civilian population’s humanitarian problems are to be addressed and a political process is to be launched. All these actions, in these three tracks, must be carried out without any preliminary conditions. And this is precisely what Russia is doing. We are actively fighting terrorism.”
Concerning the al-Nusra Front, Lavrov said, “As regards Jabhat al-Nusra, not only is the USA not touching it at all, but throughout all of our talks it has in every way tried to draft agreements in such a way that Nusra – Jabhat al-Nusra – could avoid retribution and could be taken out of the line of fire. Naturally, we cannot accept this. Jabhat al-Nusra is a terrorist organization, recognized as such by the UN, in the USA, the Russian Federation and other countries.” 
My editorial question is, why is the US giving al Qaeda a pass? Barack? How come? 
Lavrov said Russia is the only country actually providing relief. He said UN-sponsored efforts are tied up in political and ideological discussions that prevent aid deliveries. “The third area is the political process. I think I have lost my voice urging UN special envoy for Syria Stefan de Mistura to stop sabotaging political talks. He was instructed to do this. As a matter of fact, he has no other work to do. I am saying this openly because I say the same to his face. I said this to him in Rome recently.”
Our conscience is clear. “”Therefore, to respond to the German TV, our conscience is clear concerning all three areas assigned to us by the UN Security Council. That far from all countries are acting in this way does not reflect well on them and means that far from everyone is prepared to conscientiously implement the decisions taken by the highest authority dealing with issues of the preservation of peace and security.”
The Russians drive the point that their forces are the only foreign state forces operating legally in Syria because they were invited in and signed formal agreements. 


  1. Hillary Clinton is not surprised that you are taking the Russian side on Syria.

    Barack is confident that he is "on the right side of history," in Syria, whatever that means.

    The UN response to Lavrov is: "Hey, at least we don't have any blue helmet thugs on the ground raping villagers, yet. You should be grateful."

    John Kerry is nervous about meeting in Geneva tomorrow. His cadaver replacement femur is acting up, and he's not 100% sure it was obtained legally when he was there last.

    Russian TV is starting to treat Barack Obama better in their depictions. He had been depicted as various kinds of monkeys, for years, but is now being shown as a homely East African prostitute. Since Ugandan whores are held in moderately high regard by Russian crime families, this is viewed as a step up, according to Josh Earnest. #winning

  2. I think that I know somebody who could do a graphic of the homely East African tranny prostitute…

    The Russian government has no love lost for Kerry or his master, Barack.

    I'm really not on the "Russian Side". I only try to point out that there are at least two (or twenty) perspectives on this whole pig rodeo in Syria. I think that it's disingenuous for the "News" to omit the Russian perspective since they have more of a hand in what's going on than we do. They were also invited to the party and we crashed it.

  3. Barack lenses everything in terms of being a druggie, community organizer. He has no other perspective. He is neither a student of history nor is he well studied on the law. He doesn't play well with others, thus his inability to get anything through Congress except ObamaCare when he controlled both houses. —-Likely the left will paint that as fake news too.

  4. Because it's the only long runway with basing infrastructure that we have since we pulled the aircraft carrier out of the Med.

  5. I wouldn't want to be responsible for disseminating "fake news"…that's what Hillary is not attributing to her loss. However in the case of the Obama Clan, I can't rule any of that out.

Comments are closed.