This is the way it always begins.
Ok, let’s examine what would happen:
(1) Addicts are addicted, which means that they’ll find drugs or addicting substances somewhere else, legal or illegal. History proves that this is the case time and time again. So replacing Mexican importation routes with new sources and routes outside Mexico would only have a modest and temporary impact on the American drug problem.
(2) Various experts have different opinions but many who are familiar with the problem speculate that 25% of the Domestic Mexican Economy is derived directly or indirectly from the drug trade. Knock one leg from a chair and what happens?
(3) Prevention and treatment of addicts has had very limited success by anyone’s measure.
(4) Enforcement nabs roughly 15% of the narcotics that enter the United States – maybe less. Over the past thirty years the US has sent five times as many people to prison for trafficking narcotics as they did before and the price of cocaine has dropped by about 80% during that time period. Supply and demand tell you what incarceration has done to solve the problem.
(5) Legalization is a dismal hope. Alcohol is the only addictive intoxicant made available on a commercial basis. There are about four times as many alcoholics as there are people who are addicted to illegal drugs. About one half of all Americans behind bars are there because of drunken violence (including domestic violence). Full availability of narcotics would expand this problem significantly. Libertarian sentiments aside, it won’t work in the real world.
(6) Legalizing marijuana/cannabis would decrease imports from Mexico by 1/5th according to a Rand study. Mexicans in the drug business would simply shift to opium or would expand the already insanely high laboratory production of methamphetamine products.
(7) The Drug War in Mexico between rival traffickers and the Mexican Government results in somewhere between 1,000 deaths (official Mexican statistics) and 3,000 deaths (studies by those outside government in Mexico) per month. Nothing that the US is doing or could do is likely to have much impact on those numbers.
If you read down this far hoping that I had some sort of innovative solution that nobody else has thought of, you’re wrong. There is a HOPE program that has been successful in Hawaii and elsewhere in which addicts are not treated, they’re tested. A positive test sends you back into custody.
The Mexican solution to their problem with violence is to return to the old system under the PRI Party where the Army manages the drug distribution network through Mexico with one large cartel (the Sinaloa Federation being the Mexican Government’s cartel of choice at the moment) handling most of the business. It won’t work, but it’s the solution that you hear tossed about in Mexican government circles (soto voce). The drugs will still pass through Mexico, but ‘managed’ by the government.
We will not see a drug free world or a world free of drugs because people want them and are willing to pay a great deal for them. The drug genie was never in a bottle so the concept of “putting it back in” is foolish.
Hardening the US Border will have a greater impact on illegal imports from Mexico than anything else we can do. Remember, I work on the Mexican Drug Problem for a living and talk with traffickers all of the time. This thing they fear above others. I’m not saying that it will do much more than drive the street price up and force traffickers to find other routes or other drugs.
In Southern California the use/addiction to heroin is on the increase. WHY (I hear you asking that question even if you didn’t)? Because it’s relatively easy to ship a pound of heroin (not a kilo = 2.2 lbs) across the US/Mexico border and a pound of heroin has a street price of $60,000.00. Easier to ship, more profit – makes sense. Thus this is the trend. And it’s becoming more fashionable to put a spike into your arm these days among young people.
Yes…I was hoping for the solution after paragraph 7. Securing the border has to be #1 on the list. It is a sad picture of our politics and society that this is not done. This is one area where the Government can provide jobs…and works towards solving security and economic issues all at once – of course they will avoid it.
Moving to the east a few years back, I was shocked at the growing popularity (and profitability) of heroin, and the different forms and methods of use on the street. I guess it all comes in cycles…
Wow! Did one guy win all those guns?
Central and South American countries will always have a agronomical advantage for growing most anything. So whether it's legal or not, the plant-derived drugs will come from those places.
We used to grow sugar in Hawaii and process it in California. This enriched both states — perhaps unfairly so. But eventually, growing sugar cane got outsourced to where it was cheaper to grow. Hawaiian agriculture adapted, as premium Kona coffee attests.
Good (and realistic) appraisal of the situation… Too bad many will not 'believe' what you've written!
Switzerland did quite a social experiment with their "Needle Park" just north of the train station in Zurich. I was living there at the time and everyone knew that it was a no go zone, especially at night. I do recall going down there with a fearless Swiss, just for a look-see. The place was filthy.
The "Swiss newspapers did an exposee' one time describing who actually frequented the place. Shockingly, it wasn't just the dropouts and dregs. Lots of the buyers were otherwise "ordinary" Swiss youth looking for an escape from their otherwise coddled existence.
Chickenlittle, I'm very familiar with 'needle park' and that miserable failed experiment. It provides a stark example of how providing free needles and free use of heroin merely expands the user base.
I still like invasion better.
"Any way you look at it, it's a mess…but it would be a bigger mess if Obama wasn't there (on vacation) to protect us from earthquakes, hurricanes, a bad economy, and those mean-spirited suicide-vest-wearing hostage-taking Tea Party terrorists!!!" –Nancy Pelosi
Odie – The problem with invasion is: You broke it, you bought it.
Gene – According to the Democrats, the Tea Party is the biggest obstacle to the success of the 'progressive agenda'.
This is not something that can be solved with any kind of government intervention. This problem is simply a symptom of a greater moral decay. The only way in will improve for families and individuals to return to traditional values
I think that it's simply part of the human condition. Substance abuse will always be with us.
Comments are closed.