On the Matter of Standing
The Supreme Court refused to hear the Texas lawsuit challenging gross election fraud. The High Court, with the exception of Justice Thomas, explains that massive fraud in another state(s) is none of Texas’ business. Let’s look at the Texas rebuttal.
Here was Texas’ counter-argument on standing:
Voting rights are fundamental, Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886), and the Senate is a body in which Defendant States’ actions threaten Texas’s voting rights. U.S. CONST. art. V, cl. 3 (States’ “equal suffrage in the Senate”). With that standing in
its own right, Texas can assert parens patriae standing for its citizens.2Although Pennsylvania characterizes this action as a “seditious abuse of the judicial process,” Penn. Br. 2, and ‘uniquely unserious,” id. at 11, Texas seeks to enforce the right that preserves all others in a democratic republic: suffrage. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 561-62 (1964). Whatever Pennsylvania’s definition of sedition, moving this Court to cure grave threats to Texas’s right of suffrage in the Senate and its citizens’ rights of suffrage in presidential elections upholds the Constitution, which is the very opposite of sedition.The potential loss of suffrage rights meets the serious-magnitude test that Pennsylvania poses, Penn. Br. 13, and the purely legal nature of Defendant States’ violations meets its clear-and-convincing test. Id. Michigan suggests that remand to legislatures to reconsider the result of the election would not redress Texas’s injury, Mich. Br. 34-35, but that is not the law. FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11, 25 (1998). Michigan also argues that the remedy would disenfranchise millions of voters, id., but Michigan officials disenfranchised those Michigan voters. Specifically, Michigan admits it cannot segregate the illegal ballots from the legal ones, id. 9, which admits the impossibility of a lawful recount on remand to the Michigan executive. Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604, 617-18 (1953) (“admissions … are admissible … [as] statements of a party”). Remand to the legislature is the only viable option. Whether the legislature sets a new election or provides some other mechanism to allocate Michigan’s electoral votes is up to the legislature.
The new Bang-Bang Fang dating app is available free to members of Congress, defense contractors and anyone who lives near the Pentagon. “Meet Chinese girls, take long sensual walks and unburden yourself.” (Daily Wire)
Are you a politician? Are you tired of paying hookers? Now it’s woke for Chinese hookers to pay you, if you’re a big stud Congressman with access to the nation’s secrets.
Pelosi is running interference for Swalwell, who she excused, by saying that it was “love” – not merely “the spy who shagged me”.
I’d like to know how many other members of the Democrat California Caucus are in the pocket of the Communist Chinese. We all know about Senator Dianne Feinstein. Maybe Pelosi herself is getting ice cream deliveries from Beijing.
Times and Seasons
Living within Striking Distance of the Grand Canyon
Name the Aircraft
Model and mod, for example, B-24E. This shouldn’t be too tough.