Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) H-6G and H-6J (Chinese versions of the Russian Badger aircraft) bombers practiced nighttime takeoffs and long-range bombing runs in military drills over the contested South China Sea. Some interested observers rate the Chinese premier bomber as 1960’s Soviet junk, reimagined at the Worker’s Paradise. The Chinese, on the other hand praise the people’s airplane.

China’s defense ministry confirmed the bomber attack drills, saying that the drills come amid a growing number of Chinese and U.S. moves and countermoves in the South China Sea.

China alledges “indisputable sovereignty” in the South China Sea and said the recent U.S. Navy drills, carried out by the USS Ronald Reagan and USS Nimitz carrier groups were evidence of America’s “hegemonic attitude” in the region. Of course, without the presence of the US, nobody doubts that China would claim the entire Pacific and Indian Oceans.

“We demand the U.S. side stop issuing wrongful and hurtful remarks, stop its provocative military actions in the South China Sea and stop sowing discord among countries in the region,” A Chicom propagandist said.

The Chinese H-6 bombers are capable of carrying anti-ship missiles and Collin Koh, a research fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, told The South China Morning Post the bombers may have been training for scenarios including “maritime strikes on U.S. Navy carrier strike groups.”

In response to these Chinese moves, the U.S. recently filed a notice formally rejecting China’s claims to the parts of the South China Sea. In submitting the notice against China’s claims in the disputed sea region, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said “the world will not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire.”

The U.S. notice rejecting China’s claims in the South China Sea does let China retain its hold over the Spratly Islands but denies Chinese calls for territorial waters reaching beyond the 12 nautical miles surrounding the islands. The U.S. stance is in line with a 2016 Arbitral Tribunal ruling.

Following the U.S. move, Australia also filed a note rejecting Chinese claims in the South China Sea, joining a list of countries that include Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines.

The Chinese Communist Party had assured its adherents that Australia was a satrap of The People’s Republic of China. Recently that has changed and Australia is presently viewed as an enemy in much the same way as the United States is.


  1. Wonder just how effective Chinese missile would be in a fight. How much stolen USA tech is used?

    Long rumored some of the tech the Soviets stole was poisoned, causing their ICBMs to go off course. One reason Gorbachev wanted a deal ending the Cold War.

  2. Get them back behind the Bamboo Curtain. Easier said than done, perhaps, but still. Also, wouldn’t it be good to see how many of our elected reps are being paid by the CCP. How many, how much. As it is, we/I can guess — lots.

    • I’m sure that Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) could shed some light on how much her driver stole.

  3. The bombers are very deadly against an enemy with no long-range protection. Heck, any aircraft that can carry anti-ship missiles can be deadly. Even 2nd rate copies of Soviet garbage.

    Just the perfect reason for long-range fleet fighters like the F-14, but, well, we don’t have those anymore, nor their potential upgraded version.

      • there used to be on hand a nice turbofan missile truck called the S-3 viking but they got rid of that too. probably so they could by some F-35. getting shed of the larger aircraft means to me the Navy doesn’t need the big deck carrier. wonder what congress thinks.

Comments are closed.